Why is it when
a worker raises a bully case to management, that organisation will spend more
money protecting themselves than helping that person who is being treated
unethically. I read so many cases where a business has clearly done wrong to
the worker (caused harm), but will spend much expenditure on lawyers to get out
of their true responsibility - people first. The worker gets put through so
much, have to prove why “they” feel they have been treat unfairly, often while
they are feeling down, all while the company ignores the issue. Why is there
not a TapRoot, or Icam investigation done for such incidents? Why are the
people who cause these risks not treated the same as the complainant. With
workplace bullying being the number one issue at work, one must assume this
causes much risk (morale, deviation etc), the unseen risk that is. I have also
seen those who are going through this treated even worse by work colleges, they
are treated as if they are the cause...very sad
Its about a different perspective
It’s amazing when those who think they like free speech turn away when questioned. Extremist views on the nature of things grant nothing but extremism itself. You want to live in grey, then stop pushing and advertising an ideology, for as soon as a person speaks their mind, they are making their opinion...MD / The photo represents the naive thinking that one can think in an unconscious grey state of mind: you cannot think in an unconscious state (thinking is an effort). I am not sure where some get their expert titles from! The grey area represents those who think grey areas is where safety should be. Status Quo is the alternative solution that may emerge over time in following of those who think they know all. An head up arse is just where some people thrive...sorry
