With all these new
systems and ideas flooding the safety market and being promoted as the next new
big thing, the next new way, I see little to no reference to ISO31000 and
supporting documents. I have worked for managers that did not even know this
document even existed, let alone follow any of the practices it explains in
what I think a fairly simple process. I have seen some experts put down
ISO31000 with trivial points and utopian thinking. How much more simple can it
make a point about consultation and ways to mitigate risk. If organisations
just start (I mean really start not a half ass effort) to use and promote such
well prepared documents that really do lead us to managing risk as best as
practicable, we would be able to make “safe safety”.
Its about a different perspective
It’s amazing when those who think they like free speech turn away when questioned. Extremist views on the nature of things grant nothing but extremism itself. You want to live in grey, then stop pushing and advertising an ideology, for as soon as a person speaks their mind, they are making their opinion...MD / The photo represents the naive thinking that one can think in an unconscious grey state of mind: you cannot think in an unconscious state (thinking is an effort). I am not sure where some get their expert titles from! The grey area represents those who think grey areas is where safety should be. Status Quo is the alternative solution that may emerge over time in following of those who think they know all. An head up arse is just where some people thrive...sorry
